
Are you willing to spend 60 days in a residential escrow transaction?
Total Votes: 11
The American Dream, blasted by the Administration
Once again lawmakers in an attempt to protect consumers, have shot themselves in the foot. Stumbling down the path to economic recovery.
As a Real Estate Professional, I receive hundreds of junk E.Mails a week. Yes, I checked, my filters are on.
Today I received a notification from Wells Fargo. In bold letters at the top of the notification,Wells stated that as of July First., it would become even tougher to close a real estate transaction in a timely manor. Not good news.
Thousands of R.E. transactions a month are falling out of escrow. Time line is the number one cause of a buyer walking away from the purchase of a property. Disclosure reports, Appraisals, and loan underwriting is simply taking too long. Buyers are walking away in disgust. It's too bad . Now, agitate the buyer with the delay that the Federal government has added to the closing process. All in the name of protecting the consumer. We have regulated the residential real estate market into a tail spin.
Anyone that is breathing, acknowledges that we are in a screaming buyers market. Good deals abound. Prices have receded to 2004 levels and beyond. There has never been a better time to buy a Home. The icing on the cake is an $8,000, first time home buyers tax credit, for those that qualify.
In the past, a transaction could be completed in twenty to thirty days. A forty five day escrow was the exception. In today's lending regulatory environment, it is not uncommon to approach and sometimes surpass 60 days.
Much can happen in 60 days. A buyer's financial statement, as well as bank statement must be up to date prior to funding. Most clients find the constant, insistent financial probing to be less than pleasant. As it is, the escrow/ loan process is akin to a visit to the dentist office. Not fun.
In today's notice from Wells Fargo, it was relayed that HOEPA, Home owners equity protection act, and HERA , Housing and economic recovery act, would complicate, as well as extend the process time lines, to levels not previously seen..
Oh yes, and then of course HVCC, Home valuation code of conduct. Realtors and mortgage brokers are no longer allowed to communicate with appraisers. Sounds good on the surface. But pool appraisers are not always aware of local neighborhood market conditions. resulting in a below market appraisal. This can also kick a sale out of escrow.
According to the memorandum, one should set aside no less than 45 days for the closing event. And that's if everything goes smoothly. Example : A change in the interest rate of no more than .25% will effectively start the notification process over. Adding no less than three business days to the process.
What this means to you as a potential seller is that your home will be tougher to sell. As a buyer, your close date will become an uncertainty., with all the possible ramifications.
Once again, the Federal government, in the name of the people, and with the blessings of the U.S. Congress, has effectively shot itself in the foot. Your government at work.
We bought a house last year in the middle of March and it only took about 30 days to get everything closed (maybe even less.) We had great luck to close at a very low rate and everything was just smooth as it could be- our Realtor was awesome and the builder company was great. The only thing that made me wanted to pull my hair was at the end of the year, when we found out that if we had bought our house a few days later we would have qualified for that $8,000 tax credit... but not for long because I looked it up and realized it is actually a loan that has to start being re- paid 2 years later. So I am OK with no getting that money after all.
I am sorry things right now suck for Realtors and sellers everywhere in the Nation. Good luck and I hope things get better for all of you very soon.
You know I'm a bit confused on how your putting this on Obama. As far as the appraiser - Realtor relationship that had always been a very touchy situation. Yes we were able to contest idiot appraisers that valued a custom home on a half acre the same as a start home in a tract. But as far as I understood it, the reason for the distance between us was that Realtors didn't affect value. (We know thats not true most appraisers are lazy and just use our number to come up with value, but I digress)
Many of my deals have fallen apart because of financing. New rules that the banks add every day trying to fix their leveraging position.
Now I will state that if rules had been followed to this point and instead of over reacting the banks just went back to the rules that made sense we could sell our way out of the housing crisis. But I don't see in you article how this is Obama's fault. I'm dealing with stupid new issues and multiple layers of underwritng that the banks are now doing.
The banks will pull there heads out of their asses eventually, but its not because of over regulation that we got here. It was lack of oversight and enforcing of common sense, and basically simple greed on the part of lenders, realtors and all the other players in real estate transactions.
...good points, all of them.
I'll add this, if I don't have to carry the risk I'll loan you all the money you want and won't care if you pay it back.
I'm having the same situation with credit scores but it was put in place before Obama started looking at the controls. I had a 800 credit scores who's freshman daughter's deferred student loans wacked out his DTI (Ivy league school and she's going for her Masters). Or how about the one last month that tanked where Wells Fargo was unhappy with a 70k down on a 170k house. The bank "required" 8k more, the buyer got pissed off and walked. But the issues that the banks have created limiting credit were put into place by the banks themselves, before the government started looking at guidelines.
But it breaks down to a simple point, when deregulation happens of credit, people get greedy and the whole economy suffers. This isn't the first time (your old enough to remember the S&L crisis) , and unless we re instate Glass Steagal and the other regulations that served us well from the Great Depression until the late seventies when the FED started "re translating" laws this will continue as a boom and bust cycle that only punishes those that don't have piles of capital (or pull to use tax payer capital).
Regulations, guidelines, and controls are the only thing that will prevent people and organizations from using huge piles of other people money and destroying the economy with it.
Well there is another thing, but the church has been lacking in the ability to teach true morals for a few milinea now and we really cant count on them.
The $8k was additional down required by the second underwriting committee and we were informed on the day of closing. (The buyer actually had the funds, but refused to take a hit on a cd maturing in 90 days and the sellers had no equity to do a short term carry back.
There definately is money to lend, current I'm dealing with a bank that might be in your market (Bank of the West) who's only default was a guy who got cancer. These people have been steady in there lending practices and didn't get swept into the cheap money phase. So they've been a constant supply of lending and nothing has changed.
Enough staff, I'm glad you raised that issue, you know with the first batch of billions that the banks got in bailouts we actually could have been in a better position if the banks had used a miniscule amount of those tax payer funds. Hire more people in the short sale and loss mitigation departments in order to get some of the "toxic" assets off the books. How long have short sales been taking in your neck of the woods? To me its absolutely ridiculous when there are willing buyers but the banks refuse to staff or move staff to departments that would actually improve their liquidible position. Here a short sale can take up to a year, and one can go through many different negotiators just to sell a property.
THIS IS JUST GREAT!
When I return from deployment in about a month I have about 6 weeks to move to a new duty station, WA state to AZ. We're hoping to sell our place in WA and hopefully buy a place in Tucson by the time I have to start working. That's loooking a lot less likely now. The house in WA has been on the market now for about a month with no serious offers as of yet. That's at a price where we'll break even. There are a lot of deals to be had in Az, but it seems there are details on most of the properties that make the buying process excessively cumbersome. Looks like we'll be in a rental at least temporarily.
Hope it all works out for ya, I remember those days, being a Marine I made my share of PCS moves.
Thanks for serving...we're proud of you guys
Semper Fi
Thanks Rodney.
I have no expertise in this area .
I recently read about something that might help you
crusaderI .
It was an article about swapping homes between the 2 locations .
When the financial system doesn't work we return to barter !
If this is something you would like info on , just reply
and I'll hunt up the link I read .
Hang in there gyrene .
Problems emanating from loans made when standards were much looser have taken a back seat to defaults stemming from job losses and wage cuts.
"Unemployment-related foreclosures account for much of this increased activity, and the high number of borrowers who find themselves owing more on their mortgages than their homes are now worth represent a potentially significant future risk," James J. Saccacio, RealtyTrac chief executive, in a statement.
http ://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716
Good evening RayMax,
The only thing that will turn it around is the restoration as well as the creation of quality high paying jobs.
Amen, vote to you !
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |