Visit Raymond Max's column >>

RAYMOND MAX

Disillusioned capitalist searching for answers in these turbulent times
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 85; Links Seeded: 66
Member Since: 11/2008Last Seen: 11/06/2009

This year thousands of homes will fall out of escrow, thanks to Uncle Sam Obama.

Live Poll

Are you willing to spend 60 days in a residential escrow transaction?

  • Yes
    45%
  • No
    55%

Total Votes: 11

The American Dream, blasted by the Administration

advertisement

Once again lawmakers in an attempt to protect consumers, have shot themselves in the foot. Stumbling down the path to economic recovery.

As a Real Estate Professional, I receive hundreds of junk E.Mails a week. Yes, I checked, my filters are on.

Today I received a notification from Wells Fargo. In bold letters at the top of the notification,Wells stated that as of July First., it would become even tougher to close a real estate transaction in a timely manor. Not good news.

Thousands of R.E. transactions a month are falling out of escrow. Time line is the number one cause of a buyer walking away from the purchase of a property. Disclosure reports, Appraisals, and loan underwriting is simply taking too long. Buyers are walking away in disgust. It's too bad . Now, agitate the buyer with the delay that the Federal government has added to the closing process. All in the name of protecting the consumer. We have regulated the residential real estate market into a tail spin.

Anyone that is breathing, acknowledges that we are in a screaming buyers market. Good deals abound. Prices have receded to 2004 levels and beyond. There has never been a better time to buy a Home. The icing on the cake is an $8,000, first time home buyers tax credit, for those that qualify.

In the past, a transaction could be completed in twenty to thirty days. A forty five day escrow was the exception. In today's lending regulatory environment, it is not uncommon to approach and sometimes surpass 60 days.

Much can happen in 60 days. A buyer's financial statement, as well as bank statement must be up to date prior to funding. Most clients find the constant, insistent financial probing to be less than pleasant. As it is, the escrow/ loan process is akin to a visit to the dentist office. Not fun.

In today's notice from Wells Fargo, it was relayed that HOEPA, Home owners equity protection act, and HERA , Housing and economic recovery act, would complicate, as well as extend the process time lines, to levels not previously seen..

Oh yes, and then of course HVCC, Home valuation code of conduct. Realtors and mortgage brokers are no longer allowed to communicate with appraisers. Sounds good on the surface. But pool appraisers are not always aware of local neighborhood market conditions. resulting in a below market appraisal. This can also kick a sale out of escrow.

According to the memorandum, one should set aside no less than 45 days for the closing event. And that's if everything goes smoothly. Example : A change in the interest rate of no more than .25% will effectively start the notification process over. Adding no less than three business days to the process.

What this means to you as a potential seller is that your home will be tougher to sell. As a buyer, your close date will become an uncertainty., with all the possible ramifications.

Once again, the Federal government, in the name of the people, and with the blessings of the U.S. Congress, has effectively shot itself in the foot. Your government at work.

  • 12 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
48
15
2.6
{"commentId":8150033,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

Frustration abounds in the Real Estate world. Home to sell? Want to buy a home?. Either way you will be effected by legislation passed by the congress in 2009.

Is that really what our young POTUS had in mind. Putting politicians in charge of business legislation is a mistake. This is no exception.

Thousands of homes a month fall out of the escrow process. Funding and time line are the cause of these cancellations.

Once again I would like to thank the administration for safe guarding the consumer. Are your eye's wide open? Mine are.

{"commentId":8150033,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:19 PM EDT
{"commentId":8152029,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

Nonsense,

You can't lay this at the feet of President Obama. You need to back up a few years and then start down that road.

There are a lot of reasons that we are in this fix, the most of which is not forcing loan originators from sharing the the risk of the loan.

Wow, how great is it to make sub-prime loans (at best) and/or conspire to commit outright fraud (at worst) and have to worry about. As long as lending institutions could bundle junk loans and sell them like cotton candy at the fair...anyone with half a brain could see this train wreck coming.

{"commentId":8152029,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:05 AM EDT
{"commentId":8152174,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

Great Rodney. Events move quickly in the financial world. Believe me , strict compliance guide lines have been in place for well over 3 years.

Without a doubt, some loan applicants in 2004,2005, were coerced into unsustainable loans. As far as the bundling of loans, and the selling of derivatives, Those issues are separate from the issue at hand.

While your point is valid, so is mine. Once again in the name of consumer protection, the Federal Government has placed blanket restrictions on your and my freedom of choice.

I for one do not need the government to protect me from my self. Do you?. Can you read a contract, a proposal,? Do you understand interest rates, points and fee's? So do I.

The pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction.

And yes, It was President Obama's program that initiated the restrictions and safe guards that are refereed to in this article. The President is not beyond accountability. His plans are not finite.

B.T.W, The Presidents Home owner stability act, as well as many of his stimulus proposals have been less than effective. Well save that story for another time. a vote to you for sharing your views.

{"commentId":8152174,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:21 AM EDT
{"commentId":8152472,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

True,

But yes, there are some people out there that do need protection from themselves.

You know how complicated a home purchase can be, when you couple that with the fact the vast majority of people never will experience a home purchase or buy only one home.

A very small percent will have more than 2 purchases in a lifetime.

I'm not saying that one is not responsible for their actions, but when you have the deck stacked against the buyer, can anything good come of it.

Some people were sheep lead to slaughter by the wolves.

{"commentId":8152472,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:50 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153062,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

While I agree with you Rodney that some were taken advantage of, I do not believe that justifies the restraints that have been put on lending criteria.

Hopefully we can find a balance soon. Now is not the time to bog down the transaction process. 1.8 million stressed properties on the market and counting.

Until this back log is cleared, we will not return to any form of normalcy in the real estate markets.

It has been statedby President Obama that the housing market must recover before the U.S. economy can recover. It's a big problem that will not be easily remedied.

To stall the qualification as well as the escrow process at this time is a deterrent to the recovery of our national economy.

{"commentId":8153062,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:12 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153167,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

I agree Raymond, real estate is very key, but I don't see how that market can lead the recovery, for a couple of reasons.

1. People used their homes as a ATM, failed to save and are drowning in debt.

2. Wages, Wages, Wages, worker's stagnant while CEO's rob us blind.

3. NAFTA, globalization and loss of manufacturing jobs.

4. Destruction of the middle class.

5. Health care cost.

...who has a job, credit and savings to buy a house?

And that's President Obama's fault?

{"commentId":8153167,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:30 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153208,"authorDomain":"socalgal"}

So the few that do have the job, credit and savings are now bogged down with more disclosures and more waiting. How does that help?

By increase the hurdles you are prolonging this economic issue.

Glad to be out of real estate and mortgage 20 yrs. was long enough for me.

{"commentId":8153208,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"socalgal"}
  • 3 votes
#1.6 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:39 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153231,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

Welcome Socalgal. You win the door prize. One more road block on the path to home ownership. Folks continue to blame the investor. No one makes a penny until escrow closes. I have a link down below if you want to take a look at the new guide lines. B.T.W, congratulations on finding your way into another endeavor. May you be successful.

{"commentId":8153231,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
  • 1 vote
#1.7 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:45 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153255,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

If I may ask SoCalGal, did you see this collapse coming?

I ask everyone in Real Estate that question, the reason why is if all the insiders say yes, and most do, how did we get here?

How could people like yourself (no disrespect intended), the 20 year people - the people that make the "trains on on time" let this happen?

A lot of fingers are being pointed at the buyers, but nobody asks for a bad loan.

{"commentId":8153255,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 3 votes
#1.8 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:51 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153256,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

Rodney, you are now putting words into my mouth. 96% of all home owners are fine. 60% of the U.S. population have no debt. Over 50% of all home owners do not have a mortgage.

Yes, there are people ready, able and willing to by homes. We need to create and preserve market conditions to facilitate those buyers.

I do not blame President Obama for the fiscal condition of the U.S. I am simply holding him accountable for the programs and restrictions that he has mandated since his election.

I would expect accountability from any political leader, President Obama is not an exception.

{"commentId":8153256,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
  • 3 votes
#1.9 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:52 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153374,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

If I attributed comments to you that you did not make, I'm indeed sorry.

You kinda lost me with your statistic, are you saying that only 4% of owners are this big of a drag on the economy.

I'm in Mich. I see it first hand everyday. What I've seen is the rich get richer and the poor get thrown out, out of a job, out of the house and out of luck.

If more red tape slows things down, I for one, don't think that is a bad thing.

Something had to change, it may have been a small part of the mortgage market, but if the effect is this devastating to the economy, then put on the brakes.

I can only say this, only the guys that caused this mess have enough money to fit it, the rest of us are broke.

{"commentId":8153374,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:22 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153393,"authorDomain":"socalgal"}

I would be happy to answer your questions Rodney.

When I started back in the industry Bush 41 was president. Things were different. There was no such thing as underwriting guided by automated underwriting systems. There was no credit score. All decisions were based on a human underwriters decision based on guidelines given to them. Someone was responsible. Those in the industry were professional and held themselves as such.

As time progressed, Clinton came into office and automation entered the picture we were given the credit score. A computer program decided if your credit was worthy. Next came political pressure to help every American obtain the American dream of homeownership. Which lighten the lending requirements and gave Wall Street a reason to look at the sub-prime market. Then the automated underwriting systems were introduced. This allowed Fannie and Freddie a way to control the amount of loans approved. They increase the amount of loans they were funding. Like when Wall Street became automated, you got to a state of hyperactivity.

Most importantly all this automation along with the invention of the internet allowed a loan officer to be in one state and service a client in another state. Allowing the loan officer to make three fold what he was able to make before all these "Advancements". While when the word got out how much money could be made it flood the industry with unsavory characters. People who saw the money they could make a quick buck, and not the mortgage industry as a profession.

Many unsavory characters along with Wall Streets desire to buy sub-prime loans lead to the constant hyper-activity. Basically greed by all parties from the borrower to the CDS trader in London, Everyone wanted a bigger piece of the pie.

Yes, I did see the collapse coming. It does not take a rocket scientist to see that the party was not gonna last forever. Since I was taught the old school way of looking at the whole picture I was watching the 10-y treasury and 2-y treasury in 2005 when they inverted it was at that point I got out. It was the last signal I need to know the party was over.

We the old school people who cared about the industry did not let this happen, we were told this is the way it is going to be. Clinton and automation along with the power brokers on Wall Street made this happen. Also bare in mind that the share holders are responsible they are always seeking higher and higher returns. Greed unchecked is what blew up the housing industry. Just look at AIG and the CDS fiasco.

{"commentId":8153393,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"socalgal"}
  • 5 votes
#1.11 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:27 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153402,"authorDomain":"socalgal"}

Thank you Rodney. I hope the industry finds balance again.

I wish you the best of luck. I know what it feels like to hold a transaction together. Chin up!

{"commentId":8153402,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"socalgal"}
  • 1 vote
#1.12 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:29 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153550,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

Thank you, that was very, very eye opening...do you mind if I copy it and send it to a friend?

My view is that the changes you state are not the cause, but facilitated corruption on an industrial scale, the cause was simple greed!

PS - not pointing fingers, just wondering if so many could see the train wreck coming how did we get here.

{"commentId":8153550,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 2 votes
#1.13 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:07 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153586,"authorDomain":"socalgal"}

Sure, you may copy it and send it to anyone you would like. I do ask that you remember this is my opinion so I am sure there are counter points of view.

Well we have had many train wrecks in our financial history. The dot com bust, the 70's inflation, the great depression and the depression of the 1890's (which i read was as bad as the great depression). It was started by the panic of 1893. Along with many others. Somehow some way we always pull through.

{"commentId":8153586,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"socalgal"}
  • 1 vote
#1.14 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:22 AM EDT
{"commentId":8153622,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

I know what you mean, I'm from a GM town, we've seen bad times but nothing like this.

There was a time when all you needed was a HS diploma and you had a good job and could raise a family (...and buy a house...lol) and live a comfortable life. Wouldn't get rich but couldn't complain.

Now...4 out of 5 plants closed, the suppliers are closing, supporting vendors gone and job moved overseas...how can we buy ANYTHING?

A lot of people here could not pay the property taxes on a free house!

It's bad...very, very bad. Doesn't matter what bank regulations are right now, unless they are giving homes away.

{"commentId":8153622,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:38 AM EDT
{"commentId":8156669,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

Thanks to Socalgal and Rodney for the thought provoking commentary.

Rodney may want to move. Socalgal, what I like about your account is the lesson that we learn from it.

We must return to putting a face on those that we do business with. As you say, accountability is key. The days of one taking A ten hour course in mortgage brokering, and working out of a home office is drawing to a close.

Many of us have good, trustworthy Friends and acquaintances that we can go to for lending advice. Use them.

Saving a quarter to a half of a point on the internet, is not the answer. And then of course there is always that Buyer Beware thing.

It is interesting that you would bring up Clinton. Isn't he also the President that sold the nation out to NAFTA ? L.O.L, O.K not so funny.

And yes Rodney, I am saying that between 4 and 6% of home owners are in some stage of foreclosure. That is a national average. Where you are, it is much higher. In the state of Oregon, were I live, it is 2.2%. Big country Rodney.

It's a complicated cause and effect, resulting in the consumer confidence meltdown , that resulted in people simply not buying durable goods. Hence , job loss. No buyers, No need to continue production.

{"commentId":8156669,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
    #1.16 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:15 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8159122,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    Ray, I was talking last night to a senior partner here in DC at Steptoe & Johnson. Guy's worth a ton and has no debt. He was buying an investment condo with an LTV of 60% and he said the lender was crawling up his butt like a fly on honey. He told them if they didn't crap or get off the pot he was walking on the deal. Lenders are now overreacting in the same manner the opposite way in which they threw loan underwriting standards out the window starting in about '94.

    {"commentId":8159122,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 2 votes
    #1.17 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:25 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8160484,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

    Right you are Bill. The economic/Fiscal meltdown has effectively cut the balls of of the Banking sector.

    Can you imagine a 40% down payment being over scrutinized?. Could be other reasons. Property values, Declining markets, Income to debt ratio, unsubstantiated income, Income tax extension or lien. Etc,Etc. But still, there is little to no risk to the lender in you scenario. Thanks for sharing.

    It should be noted Bill, that if the buyer is intending to offset a mortgage payment with a revenue stream from the condo. Only 70% of that income is applicable. Also, no less than 30% down is required on an income property by most lenders. Second home? No problem. Third or forth, it gets a little sticky.

    Are you in a declining market? The condo may not have appraised. - 5% in a declining market.

    {"commentId":8160484,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
      #1.18 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":8150746,"authorDomain":"loro"}

      We bought a house last year in the middle of March and it only took about 30 days to get everything closed (maybe even less.) We had great luck to close at a very low rate and everything was just smooth as it could be- our Realtor was awesome and the builder company was great. The only thing that made me wanted to pull my hair was at the end of the year, when we found out that if we had bought our house a few days later we would have qualified for that $8,000 tax credit... but not for long because I looked it up and realized it is actually a loan that has to start being re- paid 2 years later. So I am OK with no getting that money after all.

      I am sorry things right now suck for Realtors and sellers everywhere in the Nation. Good luck and I hope things get better for all of you very soon.

      {"commentId":8150746,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"loro"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:13 PM EDT
      {"commentId":8151232,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

      Thank you lorena. I'm glad your transaction went as planed. Not all escrows are a problem. The ones most scrutinized are the Variables as well as the F.H.A minimum down programs. You are correct , last year's program was a re- payable $7500 loan. Paid over a ten year period. Still a good deal for those that qualified.

      {"commentId":8151232,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
      • 2 votes
      #2.1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:51 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":8152746,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}

      You know I'm a bit confused on how your putting this on Obama. As far as the appraiser - Realtor relationship that had always been a very touchy situation. Yes we were able to contest idiot appraisers that valued a custom home on a half acre the same as a start home in a tract. But as far as I understood it, the reason for the distance between us was that Realtors didn't affect value. (We know thats not true most appraisers are lazy and just use our number to come up with value, but I digress)

      Many of my deals have fallen apart because of financing. New rules that the banks add every day trying to fix their leveraging position.

      Now I will state that if rules had been followed to this point and instead of over reacting the banks just went back to the rules that made sense we could sell our way out of the housing crisis. But I don't see in you article how this is Obama's fault. I'm dealing with stupid new issues and multiple layers of underwritng that the banks are now doing.

      The banks will pull there heads out of their asses eventually, but its not because of over regulation that we got here. It was lack of oversight and enforcing of common sense, and basically simple greed on the part of lenders, realtors and all the other players in real estate transactions.

      {"commentId":8152746,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
      • 4 votes
      Reply#3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:24 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8152815,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

      ...good points, all of them.

      I'll add this, if I don't have to carry the risk I'll loan you all the money you want and won't care if you pay it back.

      {"commentId":8152815,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
      • 2 votes
      #3.1 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:32 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8153161,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

      Welcome Blearc. I have never had an appraiser land on my number. I have had appraisers cal me on closed transactions , asking for clarification as to contributions from sellers, improvements, etc. There is nothing wrong with substantiating market conditions as well as comparable value through qualified , reputable brokers.

      I don't have to tell you that Brokers as well as appraisers are heavily regulated, and have been for a decade or more.

      Although I watched the prices escalate, and the lending environment go nuts in the eary 2000's I can't put my finger on the exact cause. I am only privy to markets in California, Oregon and Nevada. I can't speak for the rest of the nation.

      I am pointing at the Obama administration for one reason. President Obama's Home owner stabilization act, as well as his stimulus restrictions, and conditions placed on Freddy, Fanny and F.H.A, have stifled the market.

      The honorable attempt to stabilize housing by President Obama has been ineffective. The numbers speak for them selves.

      It should also be noted, that as of July1rst, only 8 % of the economic stimulus package had been spent on bolstering the U.S. Economy. Of course this does not include the Financial sector.

      It was relayed to me yesterday by a trusted mortgage broker that loan applicants with a FICO score lower than 740, are penalized by Freddy and Fanny. Imagine that, a 740 not good enough. W.T.F. ? It is another case of the dog chasing it's own tail.

      As you said above. If lending practices were returned to a reasonable , workable level, we could sell our way out of this mess. I hand it to you Blearc, you have answered your own question.

      How can I direct this problem towards President Obama? Your statement is my justification.

      Control is not the answer. Education and common sense is.

      {"commentId":8153161,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
      • 1 vote
      #3.2 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:29 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8155822,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}

      I'm having the same situation with credit scores but it was put in place before Obama started looking at the controls. I had a 800 credit scores who's freshman daughter's deferred student loans wacked out his DTI (Ivy league school and she's going for her Masters). Or how about the one last month that tanked where Wells Fargo was unhappy with a 70k down on a 170k house. The bank "required" 8k more, the buyer got pissed off and walked. But the issues that the banks have created limiting credit were put into place by the banks themselves, before the government started looking at guidelines.

      But it breaks down to a simple point, when deregulation happens of credit, people get greedy and the whole economy suffers. This isn't the first time (your old enough to remember the S&L crisis) , and unless we re instate Glass Steagal and the other regulations that served us well from the Great Depression until the late seventies when the FED started "re translating" laws this will continue as a boom and bust cycle that only punishes those that don't have piles of capital (or pull to use tax payer capital).

      Regulations, guidelines, and controls are the only thing that will prevent people and organizations from using huge piles of other people money and destroying the economy with it.

      Well there is another thing, but the church has been lacking in the ability to teach true morals for a few milinea now and we really cant count on them.

      {"commentId":8155822,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
      • 2 votes
      #3.3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:06 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8156875,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

      I believe you hit the base root of the problem in your closing statement. Moral accountability. I continually run into young prospects that truly believe that they should have a home , simply because they want one. Not because they have earned it.

      They are obsessed with the idea that they can twist the federal tax incentive into a down payment. They truly have little to no cash.

      I am sure that this shot gun mentality is prevalent in the financial sector. Perhaps it is the true cause and effect of the real estate valuation melt down.

      Interesting side note on Wells Fargo. In our region, they are the number one mortgage lender. They are winning the game with lower points and fees. As far as time lines: Refinance 60+ days. Conforming mortgage: 30-45. Can you share with us what the $8,000 was to be applied to? B.T.W., the huge pile of $.

      I received a letter from an East Coast Iinvestor that had just kicked a closing date for the second time. They were lending at the rate of $ 150,000,000 per day, and did not have enough staff to keep up with the documentation and funding. There is $ to be lent.

      {"commentId":8156875,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
        #3.4 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:31 PM EDT
        {"commentId":8161047,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}

        The $8k was additional down required by the second underwriting committee and we were informed on the day of closing. (The buyer actually had the funds, but refused to take a hit on a cd maturing in 90 days and the sellers had no equity to do a short term carry back.

        There definately is money to lend, current I'm dealing with a bank that might be in your market (Bank of the West) who's only default was a guy who got cancer. These people have been steady in there lending practices and didn't get swept into the cheap money phase. So they've been a constant supply of lending and nothing has changed.

        Enough staff, I'm glad you raised that issue, you know with the first batch of billions that the banks got in bailouts we actually could have been in a better position if the banks had used a miniscule amount of those tax payer funds. Hire more people in the short sale and loss mitigation departments in order to get some of the "toxic" assets off the books. How long have short sales been taking in your neck of the woods? To me its absolutely ridiculous when there are willing buyers but the banks refuse to staff or move staff to departments that would actually improve their liquidible position. Here a short sale can take up to a year, and one can go through many different negotiators just to sell a property.

        {"commentId":8161047,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
        • 1 vote
        #3.5 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:45 PM EDT
        {"commentId":8167183,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

        In 2008, We could complete a short sale negotiation and close in less than 90 days. As soon as the Banks/investors received rescue funds, the response times from loss mitigation bottle necked.

        Of course this can also be atributed to work load, volume. The average time today is ranging between 6 months and never. This has resulted in most perspective buyers walking away from short sales.

        As a Realty Trac Agent, I discourage people from pursuing short sales. I recommend bank owned, or contacting a first stage foreclosure home owner. Pre negotiating the possibility of purchasing a stressed property before it reaches the point of no return is advised.

        Of course properties with valuation deficit are extremely difficult.

        Part of the problem is mortgage adjustment firms, that advise their clients to be two or more months late on payments prior to approaching the investor/lien holder. Time is of the essence. It's a mess Blearc. B.T.W, are you a member of the South Hampton Blearcs ? best to you buddy, Raymond.

        {"commentId":8167183,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
          #3.6 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:41 AM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":8153200,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

          To all interested: Here is the link to the Wells Fargo notification that caught my attention this afternoon. https://www.wellsfargo.com/downloads/pdf/mortgage/HERA_HOEPA_Retail_FINAL_E.PDF

          I trust that you will find the information useful. One more block in the road to completing your real estate transaction.

          {"commentId":8153200,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
            Reply#4 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:38 AM EDT
            {"commentId":8153652,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

            Raymond I understand your pain as a businessman trying to make a living, but if I'm the home buyer, I like most of the things listed in your link.

            Does that prevent you from making money or does it just slow down the process.

            I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, the industry was on the honors program once, right? That didn't work out too well.

            I had a gung ho Marine Corps Colonel tell me once "it takes a thousand pats on the back to erase one screw up", by my count, they got 999 more to go.

            {"commentId":8153652,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
            • 1 vote
            #4.1 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:52 AM EDT
            {"commentId":8153679,"authorDomain":"jefm"}

            Rodney,

            Did you read the link? a mere .125 change in rates reguirea a new truth-in-lending declaration which adds at least 3 days to the process.

            {"commentId":8153679,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"jefm"}
            • 1 vote
            #4.2 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:05 AM EDT
            {"commentId":8153694,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

            Ok, I understand crusader, but is that a deal breaker?

            Right now, NOTHING is functioning like is used too.

            So why should I worry about TIL, when I can't afford a house.

            Don't get me wrong, I feel for all of those people that make their living in Real Est. but I'm looking at it from the bottom up...the top always seems to land on their feet.

            If what raymond said is true, then 4% of to the population just tanked our economy, in my state, that 4% is not coming back, it's gone, along with the jobs.

            So if the economy needs to get that 4% back on their feet, seems to me we start with a job not a house.

            Just a thought...

            {"commentId":8153694,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
            • 2 votes
            #4.3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:13 AM EDT
            {"commentId":8155882,"authorDomain":"Blearc"}
            Did you read the link? a mere .125 change in rates reguirea a new truth-in-lending declaration which adds at least 3 days to the process.

            I don't know what lender you work with but I can get my lenders to kick out a truth-in-lending in 10 minutes? 3 days? what lender is really that busy?

            {"commentId":8155882,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"Blearc"}
              #4.4 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:11 AM EDT
              {"commentId":8157019,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

              Rodney, it ain't about me. As a Realtor, I am fiduciary to my client. No, that in itself is not a deal breaker. The time lag is in the response and loop back to the originator of the loan. spend another minute on the link provided, take a look at the calender. As for jobs, I agree with you 100% . Read a few of my past articles on job creation.

              {"commentId":8157019,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                #4.5 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
                {"commentId":8170016,"authorDomain":"maureen-5"}

                Time for a reality check. I work in the mortgage industry and the new laws are going to have a horrific impact on the industry. Initially the biggest problem will be due to Realtors, buyers and loan originators being in a state of ignorance and denial. I was at a seminar last month where these rules were being explained and I mentioned to a Realtor sitting next to me that 45 days was going to be the new 30. She proceeded to tell me that her lender had already assured her this was BS and any good lender could still get a deal done in 30 days or less. Oh well!?! I can kick out a GFE in 10 minutes and provide them routinely to all consumers as part of the pre-approval process. But when a consumer movves from prospect to borrower it's a whole new ball game. Most large companies will not allow an originator to print and mail the initial disclosure package. A processor or other designated employee must initiate that functtion. One thing Wells Fargo doesn't mention is that its practice is to use the three days that RESPA allows for turn time from origination to release of documents as the point when the task is completed. So really WF should add an additional 3 days to their calendar. WF isn't alone in that practice. Rarely will documents go out the same day the borrrower applies for the loan.

                Buyers want what they want when they want it. Many buyers delay complying with documentation requests or outright refuse to provide it because when they bought their last house the documentation requirements were minimal.

                The hit to the rate if the credit score is under 740 is true. The only loan with no hit has a credit score of 740 plus, a 20% down payment, a loan amount between $350000 -$417000 and set to close in 30 days. The market ain't what it iuse to be.

                I could go on for pages about the new requirements and how they will inteact with each other. I have been originating for almost 20 years. I don't know whether we will see these rules modified, especially the HVCC as that one is the result of a law suit settlement between the state of NY and Fannie Mae. Maybe it's not a bad thing. These laws will slow down the real estate industry to a level that is sustainable over time. A buying frenzy will never happen again. The price of homes will stay down and the cost of borrowering will go much higher. I also think interest rates on 30 year mortgages will return to the Reagan days of 9 - 10%.

                What really makes me crazy is realizing that except for a few bad actors at the "Main Street" level, no one who really caused this crisis will be held accountable.

                {"commentId":8170016,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"maureen-5"}
                • 1 vote
                #4.6 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:51 AM EDT
                {"commentId":8171275,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                maybeblu, sounds like you have cause to be. The last stumbling block to the road of recovery the housing sector need was more regulation.

                And yes, I do have mortgage broker assuring me that they can meet a 30 day time line. CRAP.

                My last two transactions: both extended / # 1. fourty eight days and counting. 3 extensions/ #2. fifty two days and counting. And these were buyers with impeccable qualifications.

                Surprisingly, my last transaction with Well's closed early. Time line is critical.

                Thank you for droping by. I appreciate your most thorough, thought provoking comment.

                {"commentId":8171275,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                  #4.7 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:36 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":8172480,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}
                  What really makes me crazy is realizing that except for a few bad actors at the "Main Street" level, no one who really caused this crisis will be held accountable.

                  I'm not a Real Est. guy, maybeblu, but I think you just summed up that last 8 years...in so many areas:

                  9-11

                  Iraq

                  Torture

                  Abu Ghraib

                  Katrina

                  Rita

                  Banking

                  Real Estate

                  Economy

                  ...and so on and so on!

                  Good luck!

                  {"commentId":8172480,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #4.8 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:09 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":8177785,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                  Maybe it's simply business as usual for a dysfunctional society. I have faith that we are on an awareness wave. It will simply take time to adjust to a system that will be a bit more balanced. Good luck to all of us.

                  {"commentId":8177785,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                    #4.9 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:48 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":8178142,"authorDomain":"nkycarbon"}

                    A highly contrived scenario. Someone agrees to purchase a home without contacting a lender? Can you even put the home in pending anymore for this scenario?

                    {"commentId":8178142,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"nkycarbon"}
                    • 2 votes
                    #4.10 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:13 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":8178235,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

                    Thanks Raymond,

                    I learned something new...been very informative..

                    We're on the same side, we both want this country to shine again, I have faith...

                    God Bless

                    {"commentId":8178235,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #4.11 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:19 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":8178572,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                    Good question. In an owner financed sale you certainly can.

                    Anyone else must be pre- qualified by a mortgage broker or lender within three days of signing an offer.

                    It should be noted that escrow is not opened prior to the acceptance of that offer and the receipt and deposit of an earnest money check.

                    Can intent be expressed prior to qualifying for a loan? yes, but that's as far as it will go.

                    It was recently pointed out to me by Martin Adelman that a House Bill is being presented to effectively stop owner financing. In my research, I don't find the Bill to be that finite.

                    His concern is that it will be promoted by the Bank lobby, and eventually passed into law.

                    I have a lawyer buddy that has assured me that their would be some contractual law issues, that breach the constitutionality of such a law.

                    It will be interesting to see what happens on this issue. Thanks for dropping in icono.

                    {"commentId":8178572,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #4.12 - Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:42 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":8153661,"authorDomain":"jefm"}

                    THIS IS JUST GREAT!

                    When I return from deployment in about a month I have about 6 weeks to move to a new duty station, WA state to AZ. We're hoping to sell our place in WA and hopefully buy a place in Tucson by the time I have to start working. That's loooking a lot less likely now. The house in WA has been on the market now for about a month with no serious offers as of yet. That's at a price where we'll break even. There are a lot of deals to be had in Az, but it seems there are details on most of the properties that make the buying process excessively cumbersome. Looks like we'll be in a rental at least temporarily.

                    {"commentId":8153661,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"jefm"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#5 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:58 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":8153702,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

                    Hope it all works out for ya, I remember those days, being a Marine I made my share of PCS moves.

                    Thanks for serving...we're proud of you guys

                    Semper Fi

                    {"commentId":8153702,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #5.1 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:21 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":8154331,"authorDomain":"jefm"}

                    Thanks Rodney.

                    {"commentId":8154331,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"jefm"}
                    • 1 vote
                    #5.2 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:37 AM EDT
                    {"commentId":8157057,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                    Best of luck to you Crusader. Perhaps seller participation in the loan would help move your home. Interest buy down is an inexpensive as well as viable tool. Thanks for dropping by.

                    {"commentId":8157057,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                      #5.3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:45 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":8179618,"authorDomain":"nonStitiousZealot"}

                      I have no expertise in this area .
                      I recently read about something that might help you
                      crusaderI .
                      It was an article about swapping homes between the 2 locations .
                      When the financial system doesn't work we return to barter !
                      If this is something you would like info on , just reply
                      and I'll hunt up the link I read .

                      Hang in there gyrene .

                      {"commentId":8179618,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"nonStitiousZealot"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #5.4 - Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:06 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":8249929,"authorDomain":"magic3400"}

                      Problems emanating from loans made when standards were much looser have taken a back seat to defaults stemming from job losses and wage cuts.

                      "Unemployment-related foreclosures account for much of this increased activity, and the high number of borrowers who find themselves owing more on their mortgages than their homes are now worth represent a potentially significant future risk," James J. Saccacio, RealtyTrac chief executive, in a statement.

                      http ://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716

                      {"commentId":8249929,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"magic3400"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#6 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 2:08 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":8254606,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                      Thank you Rodney. I am a Realty trac member Agent. I am painfully aware of the cause of today's foreclosure crisis. The only thing that will turn it around is the restoration as well as the creation of quality high paying jobs.

                      {"commentId":8254606,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                      • 1 vote
                      #6.1 - Thu Jul 16, 2009 6:55 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":8275314,"authorDomain":"Boonie"}

                      Good evening RayMax,

                      The only thing that will turn it around is the restoration as well as the creation of quality high paying jobs.

                      Amen, vote to you !

                      {"commentId":8275314,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"Boonie"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#7 - Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:23 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":8276657,"authorDomain":"prm-1"}

                      Thanks IL Boy. Seems like a no brainer to me. But what do I know?..

                      The government has thrown billions at the financial sector. Only 5 Billion at small business. Small business supports an creates over 50% of all jobs.

                      I know about the wind farm project. But are you seeing any other Federally funded Jobs in the Mid west?..

                      I'll be flying into L.A. on Saturday. They have the highest U.I. rate on the West coast. It will be interesting to see how folks are coping in that part of the nation. Take care. Ray

                      {"commentId":8276657,"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717","authorDomain":"prm-1"}
                        #7.1 - Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:45 AM EDT
                        Reply
                        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"624126","isPrivate":false}
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        {"threadId":"624126","contentId":"3015717"}
                        Start TrackingStart Tracking
                        Stop TrackingStop Tracking